Dako's AI Builder Notes
System
Color theme
Changsha HubOffline
大可 Dako
大可 Dako大可 DakoAI Builder · Agent PractitionerTurning AI into working software. Practical notes on agent engineering, vibe coding, and commercial delivery.
Platform links coming soon
AI coding tools come in four kinds, each for one scenarioIDE agentCursor / Trae, agentinside the editorMulti-file coordinatededitsDaily workhorseCLIClaude Code / CodexScripts, batch,workflowsAutomation-friendlyPluginsCopilot and othersCompletions, Chat,in-place editLow intrusionNo-codev0 / bolt.newPrototypes, landingpagesNot for product coreOne comfortable main tool plus one or two helpers is enough
More tools mean more switch cost; most people only need one comfortable main tool.

Four Kinds of Tools: Enough Is Enough

AI coding tools split into four kinds: IDE agents, CLI, plugins, and no-code. Don't hoard; enough is enough.

A lot of people lose the day to tool selection: try this, try that, and the day's gone with none of them mastered. AI coding tools are already clearly categorized, and most people only need one comfortable main tool plus one or two helpers vibe-report.

After reading, you should be able to answer:

  • What is each of the four tool kinds for?
  • Why is hoarding tools a bad idea?
  • How do you pick your main tool?

What the four kinds differ in

  • IDE agent: Cursor / Trae—AI reads your code right in the editor and edits across files. The daily-development workhorse; with enough context, accuracy is high.
  • CLI agent: Claude Code / Codex—runs in the terminal, good for scripts, batch work, and chaining workflows. Friendly to automation, can go into CI.
  • Plugins/extensions: Copilot and others—ride inside an existing IDE, handling completions, Chat, and in-place edits. Low intrusion, good for accelerating your current workflow.
  • No-code platforms: v0 / bolt.new—give a requirement on a web page, get a prototype. Good for quickly validating ideas and landing pages, but generally not for product core or long-term maintenance.

Why hoarding is a bad idea

Switching tools costs: every tool needs its own context, rules, and pitfalls. Using four at once means four half-learned tools, and every switch drops context google-patterns.

  • More tools, higher switch cost
  • One well-mastered tool beats "knowing a bit of each"
  • The friction of switching breaks the "flow" of vibe coding

Pick one main one: the environment you develop in most. One or two helpers: CLI automation, no-code fast prototyping.

How to choose

  • Where do you write code most days? → pick the main tool in that category
  • Are you more everyday development or more automation? → IDE agent vs CLI
  • Do you need to quickly validate ideas now and then? → add a no-code helper

Don't chase the strongest; chase the most comfortable. Comfortable, and you'll use it daily; daily use is what makes you fluent.

This article is which class you use when you write code. How to assign work, watch the process, and accept the result after you pick is in stop asking, assign the work. Matching coding, office, desktop, and cloud-teammate work is in match the product to the work.

With the tool settled, build up context engineering — the real differentiator of vibe coding: context beats prompt.

References

  1. 4 engineering patterns behind the strongest AI agents (Google)
  2. The Vibe Coding Report 2026